Comments on: How Much Money Did The Democrat Led Congress Authorize During The Last Two Years?

By: Moose

Moose — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:23:29 +0000

DISTRACTION
The money authorized by a SPLIT congress was authorized to fund the Bush budget. Bush started an unnecessary war in Iraq, not the Congress. Bush encouraged the GSE’s to lend money to folks who could not afford it, not the Congress. McCain/Gramm deregulated the financial sector, not the Congress.
Sorry, but your borrow and spend Republicans have almost bankrupt the country, just like the 1980’s. Voodoo economics didn’t work then and, surprise, it didn’t work in the 2000’s.
Bush spent the money, not Congress.

By: Keith

Keith — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:23:29 +0000

How many morons does it take to figure that Congress since Nov. ‘06 can’t do squat against Bush’s often used veto because Democrats number just barely over the Republicans. Far from the 60 votes that is required to override Bush.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/110th_Unite…
Scroll down a bit for the numbers in that link.

By: Joan S

Joan S — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:23:29 +0000

Democrat led? That’s stretching it a bit… The Senate is tied and the Dems have only a bare majority in the House. Not large enough to push through any legislation or to overturn a veto.
Next

By: Crazy Cat

Crazy Cat — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:23:29 +0000

It’s a plan drawn up by the Bush administration that has bipartisan support in congress, yet in your mind it’s all the democrats fault. Is that what they call the new math?

By: TheDude

TheDude — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:23:29 +0000

51% or less.

By: McCain drives me Insane

McCain drives me Insane — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:23:29 +0000

Well some one has to pay to get us out of the trickle down mess Reagan started!!!